Wednesday, 30 September 2015

A War On Drugs That’s Actually Worth Fighting

A War On Drugs That’s Actually Worth Fighting

The image above shows a Chinese policeman wading through a sea of confiscated fake medicines. It is now estimated that between 100,000 and a million people die every year due to fake medicine. Yet this remains a topic that rarely receives any attention whatsoever, despite being a problem far more suited to police intervention than the “war on drugs”, which takes up the lions share of drug-related law enforcement and criminal justice resources.

The argument against fake medicines is obvious: fake medicines have no possible benefit, yet cause countless deaths. In theory it is a problem far better suited to police intervention than illegal drug use, because unlike recreational drug users, victims of fake drugs are unwilling and conduct their business in the open.

So why has so little been done? There is a very important distinction between “counterfeit drugs” and “fake drugs”. Many drugs are far too expensive for patients in poor parts of the world or without insurance, so plenty of people are forced to buy counterfeits. These are illegal generic drugs, whose makers do not pay for intellectual property. This is a very different crime to that of the producers of fake drugs, which are drugs that are designed to look like real drugs, but in fact contain no medicine. By any standard, the latter is a crime on a far grander scale.

The producers of counterfeit medications are responsible for the only affordable life saving medications in plenty of parts of the world. From one perspective, they are modern day Robin Hoods who save potentially millions of lives.

Much of the world’s law enforcement agencies currently see no distinction between these two categories of crime, which is one key reason the more serious crime of producing fake drugs so often flies under the radar.

There are obvious financial reasons for pharmaceutical companies and other vested interests to fail to attack the problem of fake drugs. The very existence of fake drugs encourages patients to take genuine medication instead of generic or counterfeit medication that may be as effective. Making the problem of fake drugs go away could therefore actually threaten their bottom line.

An investigation by Newsweek has shone a light on the problem, pointing out that even the World Health Organisation makes no distinction between “fake” and “counterfeit”, using one catch-all term that obfuscates the problem: SSFC - “ substandard, spurious, falsely labeled, falsified and counterfeit”. This is patently ridiculous. The producers of counterfeit medications are responsible for the only affordable life saving medications in plenty of parts of the world. From one perspective, they are modern day Robin Hoods who save potentially millions of lives. The producers of fake drugs on the other hand are knowingly responsible for nothing but pain, misery and death through the very worst kind of fraud. The first step in the war against fake drugs, is understanding the difference.

Read the full investigation at Newsweek. Follow Simon Oxenham on TwitterFacebookGoogle+RSS, or join the mailing list to get each week's post straight to your inbox. Image Credit: Stringer/Getty

 

The Horsepower Map of the United States

The Horsepower Map of the United States

Remember the days when progress was measured not in bandwidth but in horsepower? Of course not; you're not 100 years old. And so you never pored over this map as an impressionable teenager. 

This Horsepower Map of the United States distorts the area of each state to reflect the amount of horsepower installed. Not actual horses, mind you – the year is 1933, not 1833 – but horsepower as a unit of measure for mechanical power (i.e. 1 hp = 746 watt) and ultimately industrial output.

What this cartogram shows, therefore, is where the industrial muscle of the U.S. was located back in the early 1930s. Basically, the Rust Belt before it rusted.

The attention is immediately drawn to Pennsylvania, so big and square that it looks like the very cornerstone of America's industrial might. Ohio and New York are the two other main powerhouses; and to a lesser extent Massachusetts (and the rest of the New England states) and Illinois (plus other states in the Midwest). 

 

 

The South and West are remarkably insignificant: Florida seems about the size of Vermont and Kentucky fits in Rhode Island twice; while California is smaller than New Jersey and Texas is outsized by Connecticut.

Some states are so tiny, horsepower-wise, that they're barely visible on the map. The combined industrial wattage of Nevada, Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, North and South Dakota is still smaller than that of Maine.

As they say: the past is a different country. But so is the future. How will tomorrow's economic performance be measured? And where will America's muscles bulge?

 

Map found here on the excellent Making Maps blog.

Strange Maps #743

Got a strange map? Let me know at strangemaps@gmail.com

Edward Snowden Opens Twitter Account, Follows Only the NSA

Edward Snowden Opens Twitter Account, Follows Only the NSA

It sounds like a Late Show joke, but it’s not: Edward Snowden joined Twitter yesterday and his first follow was the NSA.

At a pace faster than Caitlyn Jenner’s Twitter debut, Snowden’s account has over a million followers. One has to wonder what took him so long to come around to the social media site. Even Twitter got excited and published at heat map of who and where people were tweeting about @Snowden.

His timing coincides with a yet-to-be-announced collaboration with the Freedom of the Press Foundation. He’s also been busy leaking more stories about NSA surveillance to The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald.

As Snowden’s public profile continues to grow, it will be interesting to see how governments navigate their criticisms of him. His NSA follow is and obvious political statement about the irony of the internet as both a medium for worldwide social exchanges as well as massive surveillance.

So far, the NSA isn’t following him back.


 

 

A 6-Hour Workday: America Should Follow Sweden's Lead

A 6-Hour Workday: America Should Follow Sweden's Lead

I'm personally very grateful for the 40-hour work week, given that we'd probably still be pseudo-slaves if not for the efforts and sacrifices of late 19th-century labor demonstrators. I'm glad for the 8-hour work day because it beats the heck out of a 12-hour work day and a 100-hour work week. That said, it's entirely possible that a six-hour work day would be even better for all parties involved, and not just because I'm looking to spend more time zapping through my Netflix queue. 

Consider Sweden, a country that's frequently regarded as one of the world's most awesome (in spite of the shade my friend Orion Jones likes to throw its way). More and more Swedish companies have begun experimenting with the six-hour work day -- and many of them are sticking by the switch after being pleased with the results. The argument in favor generally begins like this:

"I think the eight-hour workday is not as effective as one would think... Some people would argue that [a six-hour day] is a costly measure for the company, but that is based on a conventional conception that people are effective 100% of an eight-hour day."

Enacting a six-hour day is fairly simple. You ask your employees to minimize personal business (that means no social media), discard useless meetings, and encourage folks to spend more time with their families and on restful activities...

That's Linus Feldt, CEO of Stockholm-based app developer Filimundus, as quoted in this piece by Adele Peters. Feldt explains that his company's work hour reduction has led to more-focused employees wasting a whole lot less time on non-work tasks and in pointless meetings. It's also given Filimundus and similar firms an opportunity to prove they're dedicated to their workers and value their lives outside of the office. That's the sort of thing that nips turnover in the bud.

Boston College professor Juliet Schor thinks Americans work too much. Compared to the rest of the world, they do.


Think about it this way: What do you value more, time or money? Would you rather have a 40+ hr/wk job that pays well or a 30 hr/wk job that pays a little less, but offers you the chance at more freedom? Either choice is acceptable depending on your priorities and ambition, but I'd hazard a guess that the 30-hour gig would be a lot more popular with job seekers. 

Will the 6-hour work day ever gain traction in the United States?

Enacting a six-hour day is fairly simple. You ask your employees to minimize personal business (that means no social media), discard useless meetings, and encourage folks to spend more time with their families and on restful activities so they'll be ready to go-go the next day. Companies like Filimundus have found that cutting away the inefficiency that comes with the long work day allows them to get as much done in six hours as they did in eight, but with much happier employees.

Will the 6-hour work day ever gain traction in the United States? I have some serious doubts; we, as a culture, are awfully set in our ways, even if our ways are dumb and ineffective. But maybe some forward-thinking, labor-friendly employer will find a way to pull it off while maintaining steady profit. We'll just have to wait and see.

--

Robert Montenegro is a writer, playwright, and dramaturg who lives in Washington DC. His beats include the following: tech, history, sports, geography, culture, and whatever Elon Musk has said on Twitter over the past couple days. He is a graduate of Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.You can follow him on Twitter at @Monteneggroll and visit his po'dunk website at robertmontenegro.com.

Read more at Fast Company

A Good Night’s Sleep? The Truth about Using Marijuana and Alcohol as Sleep Aids

A Good Night’s Sleep? The Truth about Using Marijuana and Alcohol as Sleep Aids

One in three people are said to suffer from occasional insomnia, and anyone who has experienced a more serious form of this sleep disorder will know just how frustrating and debilitating it can be. While some insomniacs turn to sleeping pills to assure them of a good night’s sleep, in the long run this is neither effective nor advisable, medically speaking. Many others rely on self-medication to help them drop off, with alcohol and marijuana commonly cited as effective sleep aids.

But how successful are these drugs in inducing a good night’s sleep – and what are the drawbacks, over time, to using them as sleep aids?

Does a nightcap really help you sleep well? Image by srslyguys.

A Nightcap or Three

“I’ve relied on a nightcap – or three – to send me to sleep for years,” says Nick, a computer engineer who’s struggled with insomnia since he was a teenager. “I know people say you shouldn’t drink before bed, but for me it was the only thing that worked. My insomnia peaked during my last year of college, and I was prescribed sleeping pills by my doctor but they had terrible side effects – I started suffering from extreme mood swings and they left a nasty, metallic taste in my mouth the next day.”

Nick decided to switch to a classic sleep aid: a nightcap – in his case, a few whiskeys in the hours leading up to bedtime. Though it’s common knowledge that on the whole, alcohol can be detrimental to sleep, around 15% of people regularly use alcohol to drop off. Studies suggest that alcohol loses its benefit as a sleep aid after just a few nights, and after several nights of drinking your body builds up a tolerance to its soporific effects.

Further, a study this year by scientists at the University of Melbourne found that students who drank alcohol before going to bed displayed interrupted sleep patterns. While this study did, like many before it, find evidence that alcohol can help to reduce the time it takes to actually fall asleep, it also cemented the idea that alcohol is not conducive to a good night’s sleep.

Alcohol significantly reduces REM sleep, the deepest stage of sleep where dreaming is most likely to occur. It does, conversely, increase slow-wave sleep during the first half of the night, a stage of sleep linked to the body’s healing and restoration. So it seems there is somewhat of a compromise: alcohol can help you fall asleep and enjoy a restful first half of the night, but the tradeoff is disrupted, fragmented sleep for the second half. Naturally, people are affected in different ways and there are many people like Nick who insist that a stiff drink before bed is actually beneficial overall:

“I honestly feel rested the next morning. Perhaps the second half of my sleep isn’t as restful as it could be, but it certainly beats the alternative – a sleepless night, tossing and turning and becoming more and more frustrated. Or, turning to sleeping pills, where the long-term effects still aren’t known, and experiencing adverse side-effects. I know it’s not exactly healthy to drink every night, but it’s not like I’m drinking excessively each night; it’s just a few drinks. I’m prepared to pay that price for a good night’s sleep.”

A Deficiency of Dreams

Being prepared to compromise a degree of health for some restful sleep is not uncommon among insomniacs, as freelance writer Leah can attest. A regular marijuana smoker for over nine years, Leah has noticed negative cognitive effects as a result of the drug, but insists it’s all worth it.

“I first started smoking marijuana when I was at college,” Leah says. “I’d found it difficult to fall asleep since I was a child, but the older I got, the more elusive sleep became. I first tried pot as a college student experimenting, and found that it was the only thing that sent me to sleep. My doctor had given me some pretty heavy duty sleeping pills but they didn’t work too well. I had a friend who became addicted to sleeping pills with some really bad consequences, so I was very wary of taking them as it was.”

Aside from an increase in appetite, the best known side-effect of marijuana is probably the relaxed, drowsy feeling it provokes, which is why it’s such a popular sleep aid. But inducing sleep isn’t the only affect marijuana has; like alcohol, it reduces REM sleep and therefore dreaming – but to a more extreme effect. It is specifically the ingredient tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) that affects REM sleep, and it’s common for regular marijuana users to witness a flooding of extreme dreams as soon as they stop smoking.

“I’ve definitely noticed that I don’t dream anymore,” acknowledges Leah. “But for me, that was a pretty welcome side-effect. I used to have very vivid, messed-up dreams that would leave me feeling unsettled for hours in the morning. I can’t say I miss that.”

While Leah may not miss her dreams, they are nonetheless important. Dreaming is the brain’s way of sifting through the numerous images and thoughts that one experiences each day, and quashing this function is not at all ideal, as Dr. Hans Hamburger explains:

“By smoking weed, you suppress the REM sleep, and with that you also suppress a lot of important functions of that REM sleep. One of those functions is reliving the things you have experienced and coming to terms with them, as it were. Processing all kinds of psychological influences is something you do in REM sleep. You also anticipate the things that will happen the next day or the days after that. While you're sleeping, you already consider those and make decisions in advance."

Science’s Greatest Unsolved Mystery

It has even been suggested that marijuana can actually exacerbate insomnia; a study last year by the University of Pennsylvania found that people who began using marijuana early on in life were more prone to sleep problems later. However, it must be noted that this notion is still inconclusive. While around 42% of daily marijuana users experienced sleep disturbances when they quit (just as nearly 75% of alcoholics experienced insomnia for a period after quitting), for regular uses like Leah this is inconsequential:

“I suffered from chronic insomnia way before I started smoking pot. I do wish I didn’t have to rely on it though, because while it means I can guarantee a long, deep sleep, it does affect me negatively in some ways. I’m usually quite groggy in the mornings – although, far less groggy than I would be if I hadn’t slept at all! But I have started to notice the effect on my memory, which is quite alarming considering that I’m not even 30 yet. But realistically, what else can I do if I want to sleep and refuse heavy medication? There’s no cure for insomnia; I can’t afford to go to a sleep clinic and even if I could, I don’t have the time for it.”

Unfortunately for Leah, the causes and cures of insomnia still remain, to a large part, a mystery to scientists. Though we spend around a third of our lives sleeping – and all animals sleep in various forms – the fact remains that scientists still don’t fully understand why: sleep has even been called “one of the greatest unsolved mysteries of science”. Despite the risks associated with self-medicating with alcohol or marijuana, it seems that the threat of not sleeping at all counteracts that – to insomniacs, at least.

 

 

Man Takes First Step in 5 Years Thanks to Algorithm that Reads Brain Waves

Man Takes First Step in 5 Years Thanks to Algorithm that Reads Brain Waves

Spinal cord injuries sever the connection to the brain, making it incapable for the mind to relay messages to walk. But the brain still has the capacity to send signals, paralyzed patients just need a new system that bypasses the spinal cord.

Researchers at the University of California, Irvine created one such system that allowed a paraplegic man to walk for the first time in five years. The man had been paralyzed from the waist down and was able to take his first steps.

Researchers outfitted him with a system that filtered out electrical signals through an algorithm to isolate brain waves dealing with leg movement. After those signals were processed, they were sent to electrodes placed around the knees, triggering the muscles to move.

The result can be seen in the video below:

“We showed that you can restore intuitive, brain-controlled walking after a complete spinal cord injury, UCI biomedical engineer Zoran Nenadic, said in a press release. “This noninvasive system for leg muscle stimulation is a promising method and is an advance of our current brain-controlled systems that use virtual reality or a robotic exoskeleton.”

The next step will be moving into invasive systems, such as brain chips and implants, that would allow for greater precision when initiating movement.

This study is just one in a long line of advancements in exoskeletal and brain-control systems research, giving wheelchair-bound patients hope of reviving their independence in the future.

--

Natalie has been writing professionally for about 6 years. After graduating from Ithaca College with a degree in Feature Writing, she snagged a job at PCMag.com where she had the opportunity to review all the latest consumer gadgets. Since then she has become a writer for hire, freelancing for various websites. In her spare time, you may find her riding her motorcycle, reading YA novels, hiking, or playing video games. Follow her on Twitter: @nat_schumaker

Photo Credit: Shutterstock

Tuesday, 29 September 2015

In the Post-Employment Future, We’ll Explore Our Inner Selves

In the Post-Employment Future, We’ll Explore Our Inner Selves

Will the second machine age turn us into a nation of lotus-eaters? Will opiates, psychotropic drugs, intoxicants, and entheogens rise to dominance in an unstructured future? If you are regularly too high to visit your mother, read a book, or put your pants on, then you are definitely doing it wrong. If, on the other hand, consciousness exploration is a disciplined part of a well-rounded, social, intellectual, and creative life, then only puritans can still be horrified by it. The pursuit of transcendent experiences will become a connoisseur art when we’re all unemployed.

[S]piritual technologies [will] bring our minds into the present moment and help us overcome the cravings of consumer culture.

In traditional Hindu and Buddhist culture, parents fulfilled their roles as breadwinners, protectors, and teachers of their children, but when the nest was finally empty, they were released from their householder duties and (if they wished) wandered the world to explore the mysteries of consciousness, and metaphysics. So, a mendicant culture was supported, and “holy men” (and women, to a lesser degree) were free to explore inner space.

In the West now, we are realizing the restorative and therapeutic aspects of mindfulness (sati), and many schools, businesses, prisons, and social groups are adopting secular forms of this Buddhist meditation to help with epidemic levels of American stress, and the juvenile demands of the ego. When we’re all unemployed, it will be our opportunity to work with these spiritual technologies that bring our minds into the present moment and help us overcome the cravings of consumer culture.

Sam Harris discusses the virtues of psychedelics such as LSD and MDMA acknowledging their profound consciousness-altering properties.

--

Stephen T. Asma is Professor of Philosophy at Columbia College Chicago, where he is also Senior Fellow of the Research Group in Mind, Science and Culture. He is the author of ten books, including The Evolution of Mind and Against Fairness and writes regularly for The New York Times, the Chronicle of Higher Education, and Skeptic magazine. Asma is also a blues/jazz musician who has played onstage with many musical artists, including Bo Diddley and Buddy Guy. His website is www.stephenasma.com

Image courtesy of iStock

Why Overly-Altruistic People Make Us Uncomfortable

Why Overly-Altruistic People Make Us Uncomfortable

This weekend at the The New Yorker Festival Larissa MacFarguhar plans to tackle the prickly issue of doing good. Not that doing good is bad, but rather that we get uncomfortable around those who are more altruistic than ourselves.

Our culture is rife with people annoyed by do-gooders: Rush Limbaugh mocks liberals for being too empathetic, some Catholics are uncomfortable with their progressive Pope, and recent scholarship has even criticized Gandhi.

MacFarguhar writes: "Ambivalence toward do‑gooders also arises out of a deep uncertainty about how we ought to live. For instance: a do-gooder holds himself to moral commitments so stringent that they conflict with his caring for his family. To most people, it’s obvious that they owe far more to family than to strangers, but the do‑gooder doesn’t believe his family deserves better than anyone else’s."

Why we’re empathetic to strangers, animals, or causes is not entirely certain, but the consensus is that it more or less balances out our selfishness.

The term “little goody two-shoes” dates back centuries in England folklore. The fictional Margery Meanwell is an orphan who is given a shoe by a rich gentlemen and then goes on to pay it forward. The story was meant to instruct children on how to conduct themselves in society, but now being bestowed the same title is not such a compliment.

So why do we have beef with people are compassionate? Perhaps because we feel threatened by people who are more visibly vulnerable than us. Altruism is tricky. Why we’re empathetic to strangers, animals, or causes is not entirely certain, but the consensus is that it more or less balances out our selfishness.

To discuss the topic of kindness and culture, MacFarguhar will sit down with Aaron Pitken, a poultry rights activist. Apparently, morality is even for the birds.

Thupten Jinpa explains how recent advances in neuroscience have allowed for a better understanding of the science of compassion.

--

Daphne Muller is a New York City-based writer who has written for Salon, Ms. Magazine, The Huffington Post, and reviewed books for ELLE and Publishers Weekly. Most recently, she completed a novel and screenplay. You can follow her on Instagram @daphonay and on Twitter @DaphneEMuller.

Image courtesy of Shutterstock

Trevor Noah is No Jon Stewart — And Shouldn't Try to Be

Trevor Noah is No Jon Stewart — And Shouldn't Try to Be

The Daily Show with Trevor Noah is now underway, after months of cautious optimism and anticipation. While not much has changed in terms of the writing and overall production, it does have the feeling of when Bewitched switched out Darrins. Same show, different lead. Noah has taken on a Herculean task, as Jon Stewart is a beloved national treasure whose humor is matched only by his curiosity and intellect. He gave The Daily Show its tone and made it an institution. New Darrin needs a moment to find his footing and his own voice. Stewart trusted him with the show, and so should we.

I saw Noah for the first time two years ago at Hannibal Buress's show at the Knitting Factory in Brooklyn. He reminded me of Eddie Izzard. He wasn’t just funny, he was a keen observer. Noah had been in New York only briefly, but somehow managed to “get” us instantly. Not in a pandering crowdwork kind of way, but with the eye of an outsider who notices everything. The instincts, the tone, the object work and voices, they all hit. It’s my hope that as Noah becomes more comfortable with his new role, and bring some of that “outsider looking in” perspective to The Daily Show.

[Noah] can offer us something the other comics cannot, which is the experience of a young black South African living in America and watching our various parades of absurdity go by.

His pitch-perfect lampoon of New Yorkers could easily extend to observations about our country, culture, and politicians. Some think of Noah as an odd choice, given all the comics on the scene. But he can offer us something the other comics cannot, which is the experience of a young black South African living in America and watching our various parades of absurdity go by. He won’t be Stewart, and he shouldn’t try to be. If Noah succeeds, it will be because he eventually starts playing to his own strengths and unique experience.

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart was one of the most influential forces in shaping my comedic taste. He took over for Craig Kilborn when I was in the 8th grade, and for the next 16 years I felt, as Noah said last night, as if Stewart were “ [my] refuge… and political dad.” I fell in love with irony because of Stephen Colbert correspondence piece, and during the Bush Administration I felt my rage turn into laughter. Stewart helped me make sense of a world and a time that wasn’t making a lot of sense to me, through the use of terrible puns, Goodfellas references, and interviews that were funny/serious/poignant/ridiculous. I love Jon Stewart for what he did for me during high school, college, and beyond. I think I’ll love Trevor Noah, too, but in different ways and for different reasons.

Comedy Central doesn’t need to keep reassuring us that nothing has changed. There’s a new host in town, and he will make the show his own, eventually. For my advice for watching The Daily Show, meet me at Camera 3: don’t compare Darrins, guys, they’re two different people.

Former executive producer of The Daily Show, Josh Lieb describes the struggles and joys of keeping daily political comedy fresh.

--

Lori Chandler is a writer and comedian living in Brooklyn, NY, which is the most unoriginal sentence she has ever written. You can look at her silly drawings on Tumblr, Rad Drawings, or read her silly tweets @LilBoodleChild. Enough about her, she says: how are you?

PHOTO CREDIT: Brad Barkett/Getty Images

Selfies and the Corrosion of Human Memory

Selfies and the Corrosion of Human Memory

In the third book of the Metamorphoses, Ovid tells the story of Narcissus. The son of the river-god Cephisus and the “loveliest of nymphs” Liriope, Narcissus was blessed with overwhelming good looks. Everyone fell in love with him. One day, while out hunting, Narcissus bends down to take a drink from a fountain. He sees his reflection and immediately falls in love with himself, not unlike the hordes of people who insist the world needs more selfies.

Like anything that’s indulged too much, taking scores of photos depreciates what we’re attempting to capture; the memories don’t seem as memorable anymore.  In an attempt to be original, to stand out amongst the almost 300 million other selfies on Instagram, we actually fade into the background. We become mundane. Photos are no longer about remembering an event; they’re about displaying, showing the world who who we are. Or perhaps more accurately, showing the world who we wish to be.

Rhett Allain, an Associate Professor of Physics at Southeastern Louisiana University, recently examined all the pictures he takes, “Just like most humans, I tend to take pictures of tons of things,” he says. “Oh look, a water fountain. Now I’m at my kid’s soccer match—more pictures. Is that flower near the road? You get the idea, right? We all take a bunch of pictures.” Allain estimates he’s taken 14,000 photos so far this year. He takes over sixty-five photos a day.

Mylio, a small company made up of photographers, estimates that one trillion photos will be taken in 2015 and they project that number to grow 16.2% year over year. If all those photos were printed out as 4 X 6-inch prints and attached to each other, end-to-end, you could a make a complete round trip to the Sun and back.

Since our technology is really just an extension of ourselves, we don’t have to have contempt for its manipulability in the way we might with actual people. It’s all one big endless loop. We like the mirror and the mirror likes us.

— Jonathan Franzen

Mary, my friend Mike’s grandmother, is almost ninety-nine years old. She lives by herself just outside Washington DC and has a live-in caretaker who helps her manage the challenges of day-to-day living. Doing laundry, cooking dinner, vacuuming. All those things you and I take for granted. But, like many older Americans, she suffers with dementia. She has significant trouble remembering things. Ask her how old she is and she makes up a number. Ask her who the president is and she says Bill Clinton. And most disheartening, when she sees her grandson she doesn’t recognize him. Dementia affects nearly 50 million people worldwide, with more than 7 million new cases every year, of which Alzheimer’s disease makes up 60-70%. It’s a horrible thing for anyone to go through.

In a recent visit, Mike took down an old photo album from a dusty shelf and spent the afternoon reminiscing with her about the memories contained within it. As they perused the photographs, Mary began to remember things. She began to put people and places together. Something within those pictures triggered her long-term memory, and she remembered events that heretofore had been forgotten. Sitting together, looking through old photographs, recalling crazy Uncle John and how he used to make hand-farts with his armpits, brought my friend’s grandmother into current time, into the here and now. She also eventually remembered Mike, and it was delightful.

Physical photo albums engender feelings. They remind us of things. And more than the photos, the communal viewing of the album, the sharing provoked by flipping its pages creates a special moment, like that between Mike and Mary. I’m not sure that moment would have been possible with digital photos or digital photo albums. 

When was the last time you sat around a computer or your iPad to view old photos? Worse, have you ever been corralled around someone else’s iPad to view old albums? It seems almost a violation to do so. There is something cold, sterile, and removed about a communal viewing of past memories stored on Google Photos or in a Facebook album. It’s too fleeting, too ephemeral. It’s almost as if there’s no time to review them. We need to move on to the next batch because there are so many we have to get through.

Photos used to be rare. They were difficult to take, cost money to develop, and, as such, possessed intrinsic value. That's all changed. Not only has technology reduced the cost of producing a photograph, but as some scientists believe, the advent of digital photography has fundamentally altered the way we remember.

Psychologist Maryanne Garry of the Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand claims that taking too many photos can distort memories. They can alter the way we remember what really happened. In 2014, Garry told NPR that "I think that the problem is that people are giving away being in the moment," she says. "Then they've got a thousand photos, and then they just dump the photos somewhere and don't really look at them very much, 'cause it's too difficult to tag them and organize them," she says. "That seems to me to be a kind of loss."

Digital cameras remove us from the present. And afterwards, when we review the thousands of photos we’ve taken, they are just another thousand photos. They aren’t special. Instead of Mary reviewing dozens of photos that captured major parts of her life, imagine she had thousands. They would be meaningless. And the chances of her recalling anything related to those precious times in her life would be near zero. Capturing a colossal number of photos of any event is indirectly proportional to your ability recall the event later on. It cheapens it because you didn’t live the moment, you were too busy documenting it.

We’ve lost the magic of photography and that leaves me wondering about the future. What happens when we reach Mary’s age? Will we have some way to reconnect with ourselves, with who we were, if our pictures are no longer memories, but rather simply artifacts too voluminous to process? Or worse, what if our pictures are nothing but selfies? What exactly will we be remembering?

There's More TV Than Ever, And It's Fragmenting Our Culture

There's More TV Than Ever, And It's Fragmenting Our Culture

Some of the most important landmark moments of American culture happened as we gathered around the glow of a television set. We witnessed not just live events like the moon landing in 1969, but shared sitcoms and news stories told by a few trusted anchors. From The Beatles on Ed Sullivan in 1964, to “who shot JR” on Dallas in 1980, to Must See TV in the mid-1990’s, tens of millions of us tuned in and experienced these together in real time. In 2015, entertainment is so niche that such phenomena is now a relic. But what, exactly, is being lost and why does it matter?

The closest we’ve come to having an event was the Breaking Bad finale, which was watched by 10.3 million people. But compare that to the Seinfeld finale 15 years earlier, which was watched by 76 million viewers, or the M*A*S*H* finale in 1983, which was watched by 106 million viewers. Clearly, there has been a shift in how and when we consume media, considering that Breaking Bad was on a cable channel and not a network, and that most people will we watching it later on Netflix.

Television has always been an equal ground— we may not agree on politics or religion, but we can agree that Lost was really confusing this week.

What happens, though, if we can’t talk about what happened on last night’s (enter show title here) with our coworkers or schoolmates? Television has always been an equal ground— we may not agree on politics or religion, but we can agree that Lost was really confusing this week. If our culture is niche, splintered into entertainment that is specific to our tastes, then losing the great uniter of TV means we’re losing one of the few things that connected us beyond our many demographic differences.

I recently wrote about how diversity in television affects our attitudes towards minorities, and I’m concerned that as we sequester ourselves to watch only the programs we like, we’re missing out on hearing other perspectives. When networks greenlight something like The Cosby Show in the 1980’s, our metaphorical slightly racist relatives watched this all-black family because they had to, and their attitudes started to soften.

Because we have high-speed internet and hundreds of channels, we don’t have to hear from anyone else we think of as different.

At its height, The Cosby Show was watched by 30 million people. Today, there’s a show called Fresh Off The Boat that features an all-Asian family that averages 5 million viewers. If someone is bothered by that show, or Black-ish, they can turn the channel or watch Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, or whatever else is on Apple TV. It’s indicative of a bigger problem: because we have high-speed internet and hundreds of channels, we don’t have to hear from anyone else we think of as different, and then we can just keep them in the stereotyped box we created for them. Why have our ideas challenged when we can cuddle up in our echo chamber and hear our opinions fed back to us, keeping us comfortable and placated?

I love television, I think it’s a force for good and an agent for change. But the TV I knew growing up grew up also. The days of sharing a moment as nation, of sitting in front of a TV and knowing everyone was doing the same, are as dated as CBS and the multicam sitcom. Maybe I’m just nostalgic, or have my own bias towards a device that always felt more like a friend. I miss the collective experiences we used to have, but spoiler alert: those times are dead.

Actress and comedian Maysoon Zayid argues that casting entertainment roles is still a way to break through social barriers.


--

Lori Chandler is a writer and comedian living in Brooklyn, NY, which is the most unoriginal sentence she has ever written. You can look at her silly drawings on Tumblr, Rad Drawings, or read her silly tweets @LilBoodleChild. Enough about her, she says: how are you?

SEINFELD PHOTO CREDIT: Monica Schipper/Getty Images

TV PHOTO CREDIT: Edward Miller/Hulton Archive

PHOTOSHOP COLLAGE: Lori Chandler

Marriage Should Be About Giving Strength, Not Making Up For Weakness

Marriage Should Be About Giving Strength, Not Making Up For Weakness

Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986) was a French author and existentialist philosopher. Her The Second Sex is one of the foundational texts of modern feminism and  philosophy (as well as the source of the quote below). She was the partner of fellow philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre for nearly 50 years. They remain together today, at least in a manner of speaking.

sartre beauvoir

Sartre and Beauvoir never married, nor did they ever establish a joint-household. Their relationship has been the subject of much scholarship and speculation. Today's words of wisdoms feature Beauvoir's impression of of one the major ills of marriage: that it's too often seen as two people completing each other rather than two people giving to each other:

simone

"The curse which lies upon marriage is that too often the individuals are joined in their weakness rather than in their strength, each asking from the other instead of finding pleasure in giving."

The Treadmill Was Invented as a Torture Device

The Treadmill Was Invented as a Torture Device

Sometimes an invented object's utility only becomes apparent after time. The Post-It note is an excellent example. Research scientists at 3M sat on the Post-It's "useless" adhesive technology for several years before a series of happy accidents spurred the realization that they had invented one of the world's great office-supply products.

Other inventions with similarly circuitous origin stories include microwaves (a byproduct of radar), Teflon (used by the Manhattan project), and Coca-Cola (a failed headache medicine).

'Back in the 1800's, the forerunner to the treadmill was invented so prison inmates could make themselves useful by turning a large paddlewheel by stepping on its spokes.'

Here's another: treadmills. An ubiquitous component of the modern gym, the very first treadmills were used as tools for punishment. Here's how Medical Daily sums up the history:

"Back in the 1800's, the forerunner to the treadmill was invented so prison inmates could make themselves useful by turning a large paddlewheel by stepping on its spokes. The wheel would in turn pump out water, crush grain, or power a mill: the source of the name 'treadmill.' Prisoners were often forced to spend up to six hours a day on the wheel, which was the equivalent of climbing about 5,000 to 14,000 feet."

So the treadmill was more or less a torture device, though I suppose that depends on whether climbing Mount Whitney every day constitutes torture. Perhaps "punitive tool" works better. Either way, no one in the 1800's was signing up for a membership.

This informative video produced by Ted-Ed offers the whole story of the treadmill's dark and twisted past:

The key takeaway here? Innovation is not a clear-cut process nor does it require new discoveries. It wasn't until the 1970's that we found the best use for our century-old treadmill technology. The Post-It didn't come to fruition until a research scientist discovered that a sticky bookmark would make it easier to sing hymns at church. Each of these examples was the product of rethinking something old rather than seeking something new.

So if you're looking to innovate, perhaps consider the rethink approach.

--

Robert Montenegro is a writer, playwright, and dramaturg who lives in Washington DC. His beats include the following: tech, history, sports, geography, culture, and whatever Elon Musk has said on Twitter over the past couple days. He is a graduate of Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.You can follow him on Twitter at @Monteneggroll and visit his po'dunk website at robertmontenegro.com.

Read more at Medical Daily

Now Get Virtual Reality Via Your Smartphone

Now Get Virtual Reality Via Your Smartphone

For a while virtual reality has been a product of enthusiasts and developers. But Samsung and Oculus have partnered to announce the Gear VR, a mobile virtual reality headset. It's consumer-grade wear priced at a reasonable $99 and can be used with any of Samsung's 2015 line of smartphones (the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, S6 edge +, S6, and S6 edge).

The capabilities of virtual reality are really beginning to come together in exciting ways, says Peter Diamandis, chairman and CEO of the X PRIZE Foundation. Virtual reality as an innovation is ready to take the leap from enthusiasts to consumer-grade technology.

"A number of technologies [are] coming together: infinite computing, very cheap high-resolution cameras, machine-learning capabilities, low-latency/high-bandwidth networks. All of these things are coming together to reinvent the virtual world experience."

By the end of 2015, we might see VR come into the consumer spotlight thanks to the Gear VR. It has price going for it as well as accessibility—Samsung does own 26 percent of the mobile phone market share, second only to Apple. The next piece is developer support, which includes software in the form of games and movies, and the Gear VR has both of of those boxes checked with three games set to launch as “made for th GearVR” and partnerships with Netflix, Hulu, Twitch, and many others.

Some movie studios are even converting their films to fit VR, however, they probably won't be as immersive as we'd like. But the British firm Alchemy VR seems to be working on a virtual reality natural history film with the voice from Planet Earth, David Attenborough.

Oculus and Samsung have done something here: taking VR and making it an accessory for your phone. So long as you have a smartphone, VR is as attainable as buying a $99 headset. There's a chance virtual reality might actually go mainstream.

--

Natalie has been writing professionally for about 6 years. After graduating from Ithaca College with a degree in Feature Writing, she snagged a job at PCMag.com where she had the opportunity to review all the latest consumer gadgets. Since then she has become a writer for hire, freelancing for various websites. In her spare time, you may find her riding her motorcycle, reading YA novels, hiking, or playing video games. Follow her on Twitter: @nat_schumaker

Photo Credit: Charley Gallay / Stringer/ Getty

Monday, 28 September 2015

Losing Sleep Can Really Wreck Your Emotional Wellbeing

Losing Sleep Can Really Wreck Your Emotional Wellbeing

Nobody is in a good mood when they haven’t slept well. But beyond feeling crappy, there’s evidence that we also become emotionally distracted when we don’t sleep, which can hinder our ability to read situations and people.

The researchers in this study discovered that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) that regulates our emotions, misfires when transmitting information with the frontal lobe. These imprecise neurological communications then lead to non-discretionary interpretations of the world around us.

Lack of sleep not only impairs our judgement, it lowers immunity, leads to depression, and can even raise blood glucose levels.

Sleep, while essential, is also a mystery. While we all do it, no one is sure why. In this month’s Scientific American, new research shows that lack of sleep not only impairs our judgement, it lowers immunity, leads to depression, and can even raise blood glucose levels.

Perhaps these negative effects are why sleeping--something that should come naturally to us--is a multi-billion dollar industry. Less than 50% of Americans say they get adequate shut eye for reasons as varied as stress to sleep apnea. To combat decreased productivity and the propensity for sickness, some companies have tried to encourage sleeping by introducing sleep pods in the workplace.

[S]leeping--something that should come naturally to us--is a multi-billion dollar industry.

If you don’t work at Google, a sleep pod from MetroNaps will cost your a cool $8,000-$13,000. Or, you could turn off your phone, TV, and computer and get in bed early because every hour of sleep before midnight equals two after it.

Arianna Huffington

says that if you want to protect your brain, you're going to need to sleep.


--

Daphne Muller is a New York City-based writer who has written for Salon, Ms. Magazine, The Huffington Post, and reviewed books for ELLE and Publishers Weekly. Most recently, she completed a novel and screenplay. You can follow her on Instagram @daphonay and on Twitter @DaphneEMuller.

Image 

How Far is Too Far to Prevent Climate Change?

How Far is Too Far to Prevent Climate Change?

We're at a tipping point in human history when it comes to climate change. Meanwhile, scientist are preparing to take extreme measures to stop the coming catastrophe.

The eruption of the Mount Pinatubo volcano in the Philippines gave scientists an idea. As the volcanic ash spewed across the sky, it helped reflect the sun's rays, cooling the Earth.

Ken Caldeira, a climate scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science, explained in an interview with PRI: “The planet was more or less a degree Fahrenheit cooler than it otherwise would’ve been despite the increasing rise in greenhouse gases.”

The ash helped block the sun's rays from reaching the Earth—less sun, meant less heat. This led scientists to wonder how they could artificially create this effect to alter the path of climate change.

“We need to decide as a civilization whether this is going to be mostly a natural world ... and interfere as little as possible on natural systems. Or are we going to ... manage it the way we’ve managed so many other things.”

“There are planes that can go up to the stratosphere now,” Caldeira said in an interview with PRI. “The spraying technologies are well-developed … The bigger question is what are the unintended consequences of doing such a dramatic act.”

This premise has already been explored in the dystopian sci-fi film, Snowpiercer. The story goes that humanity is at the end of their rope after an attempt to avert the effects of global warming goes wrong. Scientists developed a chemical which planes sprayed across the stratosphere. The result caused an unintended reaction, which created an extreme temperature shift causing the planet to freeze over. The only survivors reside on this train, which stays in constant motion, protecting it from freezing. Pretty bleak.

“I think we’re at a bit of a crossroads,” Caldeira said to PRI. “We need to decide as a civilization whether this is going to be mostly a natural world ... and interfere as little as possible on natural systems. Or are we going to ... manage it the way we’ve managed so many other things.”

Bill Nye is kept up by the notion of climate change. It's happening, and yet little has been done on a global scale to drastically change our fate. 

The Obama administration has introduced 40 new climate change initiatives to help fight carbon emissions. But America isn't the only major player in this global issue. The world needs developing countries, such as India and China, to adopt cleaner energy solutions. But that's not going to happen so long as coal remains cheap, which is why some have suggested America buys up coal to keep it in the ground.

It's possible humanity might get to the point where we feel we must take such drastic measures to secure our survival.

--

Natalie has been writing professionally for about 6 years. After graduating from Ithaca College with a degree in Feature Writing, she snagged a job at PCMag.com where she had the opportunity to review all the latest consumer gadgets. Since then she has become a writer for hire, freelancing for various websites. In her spare time, you may find her riding her motorcycle, reading YA novels, hiking, or playing video games. Follow her on Twitter: @nat_schumaker

Photo Credit:  DIEGO MAIN / Stringer/ Getty

Is the World About to Run Out of Human Labor?

Is the World About to Run Out of Human Labor?

Overpopulation, wage stagnation, rising home costs, the 1%: Take your pick from these economic gripes when discussing the problem of the shrinking middle class. And there’s good reason to complain because all 50 states have seen the number of middle-income earners diminish over the past 15 years.

But that trend could be turning around, not only in the United States but globally. In a paper prepared for Morgan Stanley, two British economists argue that the plummeting birth rate combined with increased life expectancy worldwide will cause a labor shortage in the upcoming decades that will then lead to a reversal of corporate hegemony.

"Companies have been making pots of money but life isn't going to be so cozy for them anymore."

According to London School of Economics Professor Charles Goodhart, the co-author of the paper, "We are on the cusp of a complete reversal. Labor will be in increasingly short supply. Companies have been making pots of money but life isn't going to be so cozy for them anymore.”

This study sounds all well and good except for one minor detail not taken into consideration--robots. From store clerks to pharmacists, robots are increasingly taking over both low and high skill labor. It’s even been predicted that robots will soon account for 47% of all labor in the United States.  

"We are on the cusp of a complete reversal."

Given the rising costs of education and training, these predictions are enough to induce a panic attack. However, some experts argue that all these automated technologies will actually create new jobs and new markets. Medicine, for example, might actually become more human again because doctors won’t be tasked with the cognitive demand of managing patient data.

There’s not clear take away about the future of human economic capital, but if the population of people is shrinking while the number of robots is rising, the reality may be that very soon they will outnumber us all. And if that happens, we will definitely need jobs to train robots to be compassionate towards us.

At the moment, the real threat to our jobs isn't offshoring, it's robotic automation, says Dr. James Manyika, member of the White House Global Development Council.

--

Natalie Shoemaker has been writing professionally for 6 years. After graduating from Ithaca College with a degree in Feature Writing, she snagged a job at PCMag.com where she had the opportunity to review all the latest consumer gadgets. Since then she has become a writer for hire, freelancing for various websites. In her spare time, you may find her riding her motorcycle, reading YA novels, hiking, or playing video games. Follow her on Twitter: @nat_schumaker

Image courtesy of Shutterstock

There's Water on Mars. We'll Harvest Oxygen From It.

There's Water on Mars. We'll Harvest Oxygen From It.

NASA has been teasing us with a “big announcement” concerning Mars since last week. This morning we got our answers. A team of researchers confirmed the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) has found water.

After years of methodical study, researchers noticed dark streaks appearing on the slopes of Mars. These streaks seemed to ebb and flow during the warmer seasons on the red planet, indicating water.

“Our quest on Mars has been to ‘follow the water,’ in our search for life in the universe, and now we have convincing science that validates what we’ve long suspected,” said John Grunsfeld, Associate Administrator of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington, in a press release. “This is a significant development, as it appears to confirm that water--albeit briny--is flowing today on the surface of Mars.”

"Our quest on Mars has been to ‘follow the water,’ in our search for life in the universe, and now we have convincing science that validates what we’ve long suspected."

This development means resources that can benefit future expeditions. The water itself is pretty salty, salter than the world's oceans, according to scientist Alfred McEwen. The researchers estimate at least 100,000 cubic meters of water. But it's wet soil, rather than standing water, which means researchers will have to develop ways to extract it from the ground.

Though, it seems NASA's researchers are already on it--developing some "McGuyver" solutions to prepare for a Mars mission: Diane Linne, a Senior Research Engineer at NASA’s Glen Research Center, demonstrates one such solution in how astronauts might harvest oxygen on Mars.

This will help in our ultimate goal to become a space-faring species, which is necessary for the long-term survival of the human race, according to Stephen Petranek, author of How We'll Live on Mars.

--

Natalie has been writing professionally for about 6 years. After graduating from Ithaca College with a degree in Feature Writing, she snagged a job at PCMag.com where she had the opportunity to review all the latest consumer gadgets. Since then she has become a writer for hire, freelancing for various websites. In her spare time, you may find her riding her motorcycle, reading YA novels, hiking, or playing video games. Follow her on Twitter: @nat_schumaker

Photo Credits: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

John Boehner Welcomes the Pope, Calls It Quits

John Boehner Welcomes the Pope, Calls It Quits

How much did Pope Francis' visit influence House Speaker John Boehner's decision to turn in his gavel and mosey on back to Ohio? There's plenty of speculation going around that the pontiff must have said something that pushed the now-lame duck to call it quits. After all, Boehner's announcement was made the morning after he had fulfilled a 20-year dream of hosting a sitting pope in Congress.

But according to Boehner himself, Francis' visit only affected the timing of the announcement, not the decision itself. This is something he -- and apparently much of Washington -- knew was coming.

Boehner's announcement was made the morning after he had fulfilled a 20-year dream of hosting a sitting pope in Congress.

Since becoming House Speaker in 2011, Boehner has presided over one of the most fractious assemblies in American history. He's also faced constant strife from within his own equally-fractious caucus and from obstructionist upstarts bent on weakening his control. The Week's Ryan Cooper called him the man with "the hardest job in Washington," and it's easy to see why. Boehner's resignation was almost a necessity at this point, given that the far right would have demanded his head later this week when he'll act to avoid another government shutdown. He can rest easy knowing no one's going to strip him of power; it's hard to snatch the gavel from someone who's already given it up.

Only time can tell the tale of John A. Boehner.

No one can say for sure what the future holds for the Republican House leadership. Some theorize that Boehner acted as a seal, keeping the volatile chemistry of the House from exploding beyond its chamber. Without him, the inmates will finally get to run their own asylum -- for better or worse.

Others paint Boehner as one of history's weakest and least effective House speakers, a prolific waster of opportunities and someone who failed again and again to get his people on the same page. Perhaps a new leader won't allow him- or herself to be trampled so easily.

Only time can tell the tale of John A. Boehner.

And then there's the Pope visit. Why did Boehner choose Friday to make his announcement? He says he woke up that morning, a day after customarily (and -- let's face it -- adorably) bawling his eyes out during Francis' visit, and realized he had nothing left he wanted to accomplish as speaker. That may very well be a lie, which wouldn't be very Catholic of him, but the point stands that making his announcement on Friday allowed him to quit on a high note and on his own terms.

Considering how hamstrung Boehner's been over the past 5 years, perhaps we ought to feel happy for him: At least he had control over his exit.

--

Robert Montenegro is a writer, playwright, and dramaturg who lives in Washington DC. His beats include the following: tech, history, sports, geography, culture, and whatever Elon Musk has said on Twitter over the past couple days. He is a graduate of Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.You can follow him on Twitter at @Monteneggroll and visit his po'dunk website at robertmontenegro.com.

Read more at the New York Times

Dark Matter Dust Particles Could Cause Cancer in Humans

Dark Matter Dust Particles Could Cause Cancer in Humans

Does dark matter cause cancer? It's a fun question to play with because we don't actually know what dark matter is, let alone whether its hypothetical components are capable of emitting mutation-generating radiation. But since the stuff constitutes an estimated 80% of the universe's known matter (if it even exists), astrophysicists are constantly analyzing and re-analyzing their models trying to pin down one of science's most compelling mysteries.

One recent analysis, headed by Olga Chashchina of the Ecole Polytechnique in France and Zurab Silagadze from the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics in Russia, posits that a particular kind of dark matter known as mirror dark matter could pose major health risks to any human exposed to it, theoretically speaking. Here's how MIT Technology Review summed it up:

"Their idea is that the universe could have an invisible partner made of exact mirrors of all the particles known to exist today. In this view, there would be mirror protons, neutrons and electrons which interact to create form mirror atoms, rocks, meteorites, planets, stars and so on.

"This parallel stuff is called mirror dark matter and it has all the same properties of ordinary matter but interacts with it only weakly and via gravity. 'The resulting mirror world very much resembles our ordinary one, as far as the existence of various familiar astrophysical objects is concerned,' say Chashchina and Silagadze."

That may sound a little sci-fi hocus-pocus but this is theoretical physics we're talking about. Everything's a little sci-fi hocus-pocus -- and then some of it ends up being legit. In this case, Chashchina and Silagadze are responding to previous research which deemed dark matter to be relatively safe if it were brought into contact with the human skin. Chashchina and Silagadze instead present a theory in which potentially hazardous objects do exist within this bizarro dark matter. And when the dark matter interacts with ordinary matter, the results could be quite troublesome:

"The key interaction between mirror and ordinary matter is between ordinary photons and mirror photons. This interaction causes mirror dark matter to gain an ordinary charge... A collision between a mirror asteroid and Earth would be catastrophic. This is highly unlikely, but Chashchina and Silagadze say a much more probable event is a collision with mirror micrometeorites in the form of mirror dust particles that are likely to fill the mirror universe."

The scientists' analysis leads them to believe that those mirror micrometeorites would cause all sorts of mayhem should they come into contact with DNA, spurring the sorts of mutations that lead to malignant cancer.

--

Robert Montenegro is a writer, playwright, and dramaturg who lives in Washington DC. His beats include the following: tech, history, sports, geography, culture, and whatever Elon Musk has said on Twitter over the past couple days. He is a graduate of Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.You can follow him on Twitter at @Monteneggroll and visit his po'dunk website at robertmontenegro.com.

Read more at MIT Technology Review

You can find the full "Dark matter as a cancer hazard" paper here.

Smart Camera Keeps You From Taking Cliche Photos

Smart Camera Keeps You From Taking Cliche Photos

It's hard to believe that there isn't a single back alley in Venice, Italy that hasn't been photographed. Each year the city comes under shutter-fire—there are thousands of tourists taking pictures of everything. Much of the known world has already been captured, just Google it an there's an image. So, as a photographer, the hunt for the captured becomes all the more difficult.

Philipp Schmitt wanted to create a dialogue about how the deliberate method of taking a photo has been lost in this era where everyone owns a camera and has unlimited shots. “With digital photography displacing film, taking pictures has essentially become free, resulting in an infinite stream of imagery,” he writes in a blog post. So, he developed a camera for the photographer looking to find a place where no one has shot a picture before. The creation is called the Camera Restricta.

It works by taking your location and scanning the web for other photos that have been geotagged with the same location. All the while the camera emits a clicking noise, like a Geiger counter. If a place is too “hot” the Camera Restricta will retract its lens and blocks the viewfinder, and you won't be able to take a photo. 

“Camera Restricta introduces new limitations to prevent an overflow of digital imagery,” Schmitt writes in his blog. “As a byproduct, these limitations also bring about new sensations like the thrill of being the first or last person to photograph a certain place.”

Inside the 3D printed camera hardware is an iPhone running an app that's pinging a node.js server Schmitt built to query popular photo-sharing sites Flickr and Panoramio for images in the same GPS location. (Those curious about the app can view the project on Github.)

Photojournalist Lynsey Addario believes there's a power in photographs. She talks about how it's not only an artistic medium to draw someone into other people’s stories and struggles, but also the key to changing political policy by showing its consequences.

--

Natalie has been writing professionally for about 6 years. After graduating from Ithaca College with a degree in Feature Writing, she snagged a job at PCMag.com where she had the opportunity to review all the latest consumer gadgets. Since then she has become a writer for hire, freelancing for various websites. In her spare time, you may find her riding her motorcycle, reading YA novels, hiking, or playing video games. Follow her on Twitter: @nat_schumaker

Photo Credit: Philipp Schmitt

Was Western Philosophy Derived from Eastern Spiritualism?

Was Western Philosophy Derived from Eastern Spiritualism?

In a fascinating piece in this month’s Atlantic, UC Berkeley professor Alison Gopnik details her four year journey out of a mid-life crisis via David Hume and Buddhism. The just-turned-fifty Gopnik begins reading Buddhism, connects the religion’s ideas to those of the eighteenth century philosopher, then launches an ambitious research project driven by the question of how Hume came up with his philosophy that was “so profoundly at odds with the Western philosophy and religion of his day.”

Hume is most famous for his rejection of the idea of an inherent self. He also had gone through a psychological crisis. To help calm his nerves, he moved to small town in France and finished what would become one of the most substantial works of Western philosophy--A Treatise of Human Nature. Relying on the hunch that Hume would have had to have known something about Buddhist philosophy in order to write Treatise, Gopnik digs through archives and travels to Europe to discover that the Jesuit priests in that provincial French town had indeed heard of Buddhism and possibly even had copies of certain Tibetan texts. Although she admits that she can’t be certain, she determines that “Hume could indeed have known about Buddhist philosophy” at the time he wrote Treatise.

Finding direct links between Buddhism and Western philosophy is a difficult task, but they do play out in strange loops.

If true, this discovery would be remarkable because it’s widely assumed that Buddhism didn’t make it to the European continent until the nineteenth century. That said, Buddhism’s contributions to modern Western philosophy and religion have often been downplayed. Friedrich Nietzsche admired the religion’s complex morality while it’s been argued that Martin Heidegger may have been influenced by Zen texts. Even Arthur Schopenhauer playfully called himself, at times, ‘a Buddhist’.

Finding direct links between Buddhism and Western philosophy is a difficult task, but they do play out in strange loops. For example, in 1879 another fifty year old was in the midst of a personal crisis--Leo Tolstoy. The Russian novelist began reading widely and grew to reject his literary success (he even called Anna Karenina “an abomination” ). He greatly admired Buddhist texts as well as the works of Arthur Schopenhauer and began writing Confession, a short book premised on the question “What is the meaning of life?” He developed meaning in his later years by embracing a hybrid Christianity--even synthesizing the Gospels with Zen-like clarity.

[A]s the Buddha says, “All that we are is a result of all that we’ve thought.”

Tolstoy’s The Gospel in Brief would later have an immense influence on the twentieth-century philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein, who carried the book with him in the trenches during World War I. During that time, he began to write another extremely important book in Western thought--Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. In short, the book argues that the world can be infinitely analyzed and broken into smaller parts to the point of losing perspective of any perceived whole; then at the end, Wittgenstein tells his readers that if they have understood him, they will understand what he has written is rubbish. Or, as the Buddha says, “All that we are is a result of all that we’ve thought.”

The real takeaway from Gopnik’s Atlantic article is not that Hume relied on Buddhism to write Treatise so much as it suggests the implications of the opportunity that he may have had to access it. It is no less impossible that a twenty-five year old Scot would encounter Tibetan thought in an obscure French village than it would have been for a twenty-five year old Austrian to happen upon Tolstoy in the midst of a world war. We are always more connected than we’d like to believe. There’s even evidence that the early Church’s missions in China attempted to blend Buddhism philosophy with Christian doctrine.

As Christian historian Diarmaid MacCulloch notes in his masterwork Christianity, The First Three Thousand Years, 7th century missionary Bishop Alopen wrote a Christian sutra that seems to be “a real attempt to suggest that the teachings of Buddhism are in a literal sense inspired by the Holy Spirit.” What if some of that thought trickled back into the European continent? Drawing parallels between Buddhism and Western philosophy does not diminish any one writer’s contributions to our culture, rather it opens us up to understanding who we think we are beyond the arbitrary distinctions of East and West.

It's an ongoing dialogue, as Thupten Jinpa explains. Jinpa has been a principal English translator to the Dalai Lama since 1985.


--

Daphne Muller is a New York City-based writer who has written for Salon, Ms. Magazine, The Huffington Post, and reviewed books for ELLE and Publishers Weekly. Most recently, she completed a novel and screenplay. You can follow her on Instagram @daphonay and on Twitter @DaphneEMuller.

Image caption: David Hume, 1711 - 1776. Historian and philosopher, by Allan Ramsay, 1754. Oil on canvas. . (Photo by National Galleries Of Scotland/Getty Images)

[VIDEO] There is Liquid Water Flowing Right Now on Mars

[VIDEO] There is Liquid Water Flowing Right Now on Mars

In a press conference this morning at 11:30 am Eastern time, NASA scientists confirmed the presence of liquid water on Mars, as evidenced by mineral streaks on the surface that ebb, flow, and change color over time. 

From NASA's press release:

“It took multiple spacecraft over several years to solve this mystery, and now we know there is liquid water on the surface of this cold, desert planet,” said Michael Meyer, lead scientist for NASA’s Mars Exploration Program at the agency’s headquarters in Washington. “It seems that the more we study Mars, the more we learn how life could be supported and where there are resources to support life in the future.” 

Child’s Play: Picasso the Sculptor

Child’s Play: Picasso the Sculptor

“It took me four years to paint like Raphael,” artist Pablo Picasso famously said, “but a lifetime to paint like a child.” After years of serious training as a painter to learn all the rules of the trade, Picasso pursued for the rest of his life the innocent disregard for rules of a child. That disregard for “the right way” of painting by Picasso gave the world Cubism, Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, Guernica, and a host of other masterpieces stretching over seven decades in front of an easel. But while Picasso painted for the whole world to see, he also sculpted in private for his own pleasure and edification. Picasso Sculpture, a new exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art, New York, looks at how Picasso’s innocent, inventive, inner child ran free in a medium he never formally studied—sculpture.

Picasso Sculpture gathers together more than 140 sculptures made between from 1902 and 1964, including 50 from the Musée national Picasso–Paris, the institution that received Picasso’s personal collection upon his death in 1973, which included many of these sculptures that Picasso kept in his home and never publically exhibited. Picasso Sculptures organizes the pieces chronologically, skipping from inspired sculptural period to period, just as Picasso did. The curators identify “Picasso’s commitment to sculpture [as] episodic rather than continuous,” with each gallery or two devoted to “each new phase [that] brought with it a new set of tools, materials, and processes, and often a new muse and/or technical collaborator.” Picasso’s child’s play at sculpture followed childlike whims rather than any kind of set plan.

Image: Pablo Picasso (Spanish, 1881–1973). Glass of Absinthe. Paris, spring 1914. Painted bronze with absinthe spoon. 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 x 3 3/8″ (21.6 x 16.4 x 8.5 cm), diameter at base 2 1/2″ (6.4 cm). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Gift of Louise Reinhardt Smith. © 2015 Estate of Pablo Picasso / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

 

The first galleries hold Picasso’s earliest attempts at sculpture. Looking at Picasso’s earliest sculptures—heavy, solid, and motionless as 1902’s Seated Woman—you can see the first steps of a person with no idea what they’re doing and just mimicking others, but still trying to find his own voice. Many of these sculptures feature then-muse Fernande Olivier and parallel Picasso’s paintings. After a wood-carving phrase inspired by African and Oceanic sculptures and then a 3-year sculpting hiatus ending in 1912, Picasso’s sculpture and painting finally begin to diverge. In spring 1914 Picasso created six unique sculptures each titled Glass of Absinthe (shown above). Reunited for the first time ever since Picasso’s studio, each Glass of Absinthe features a different ornamental absinthe spoon perched like a hat atop a head-like bronze “glass.” Fun, irreverent, and maybe a little drunk, these sculptures perfectly capture Picasso’s wild Montmatre days surrounded by the intoxicating spirit of creative collaboration.  

Image: Pablo Picasso (Spanish, 1881–1973). Woman in the Garden. Paris, spring 1929–30. Welded and painted iron. 6 ft. 9 1/8 in. × 46 1/16 in. × 33 7/16 in. (206 × 117 × 85 cm). Musée national Picasso–Paris. © 2015 Estate of Pablo Picasso/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

 

World War I ended the Montmartre party, unfortunately. Picasso’s friend Guillaume Apollinaire sustained wounds during the war but died during the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918. Commissioned to create a memorial to the poet who helped publicize his earliest work, Picasso struggled to capture the spirit of Apollinaire in sculpture for years. After collaborating with sculptor Julio González and learning from him how to weld metal, Picasso made one last attempt to remember the poet with Woman in the Garden (shown above), an assemblage of salvaged metal welded together and painted white that magically suggests a woman tending to long-stemmed flowers as her metallic hair floats in the wind.  The piece literally defies gravity as the lightest of subjects come to life in cold, hard iron. It’s not a portrait of Apollinaire, but it does capture the humor and lightness of his poetry, as well as Picasso’s increasing comfort with expressing his most intimate feelings through sculpture, his “second language.”

 

Image: Pablo Picasso (Spanish, 1881–1973). Flowery Watering Can. Paris, 1951–52. Plaster with watering can, metal parts, nails, and wood, 33 11/16 × 16 9/16 × 14 15/16 in. (85.5 × 42 × 38 cm). Musée national Picasso–Paris. © 2015 Estate of Pablo Picasso/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

 

Even when World War II disrupted Picasso’s life once more, he continued to sculpt. When war-driven metal shortages made sculpting in metal illegal in Nazi-controlled Paris, Picasso snuck his sculptures out under cover of night to the foundry.  After the war’s end and a brief period of infatuation with classical Greek and Roman sculpture, Picasso began to sculpt using found objects to create increasingly complex works. His use of everyday, domestic objects reflects his post-war return to an everyday, domestic life with new love and new muse Françoise Gilot, who was 40 years younger the artist. Life with Gilot infused into Picasso’s sculpture a youthful playfulness after war’s weariness, as seen in works such as Flowery Watering Can (shown above). Starting with an actual watering can, Picasso added scraps of metal, nails, wood, and plaster to create a recognizable floral subject, but seen through the eyes of a manchild artist refusing to grow up, grow old, and grow to accept the rules.

Walking through the galleries of Picasso Sculpture, you can’t help but wonder what’s in the next room. The clearly seen impish delight Picasso took in taking newer, different directions in sculpture proves it wasn’t just a diversion from his painting but a whole new approach to a different medium. Sculpture allowed Picasso to take anything and everything at hand and turn it into art, including transforming torn and burnt tissue paper into the head of a dog or a death’s head or engraving comical faces onto tiny pebbles. SNL poked fun at Picasso as an instant art machine years ago, but it’s important to remember that many of these works were made purely for Picasso’s personal pleasure and were never seen by the public until after his death.

 

Image: Pablo Picasso (Spanish, 1881–1973). Chair. Cannes, 1961. Painted sheet metal 45 1/2 × 45 1/16 × 35 1/16 in. (115.5 × 114.5 × 89 cm). Musée national Picasso–Paris. © 2015 Estate of Pablo Picasso/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

 

In the final galleries we see Picasso’s final sculptural period, marked, of course, by his happiness with his latest and last muse, Jacqueline Roque, subject of over 400 portraits by Picasso and his wife at the time of his death. In a fury of late-career activity, Picasso created over 120 sheet metal sculptures over an 18-month period. Bull (top of post) and Chair (shown above) belong to this final period where Picasso returned to the two-dimensional possibilities of Cubism through sheet metal but now in the three-dimensional world of sculpture. Despite the two-dimensionality of the sheets, these works invite you to walk around and find new dimensions of meaning. Similarly, Picasso Sculpture invites you to revisit Picasso once again and find new, unrecognized dimensions of the man and the artist, or rather, the man and the child who made art even when nobody was watching.

[Top Image: Pablo Picasso (Spanish, 1881–1973). Bull. Cannes, c. 1958. Plywood, tree branch, nails, and screws. 46 1/8 x 56 3/4 x 4 1/8″ (117.2 x 144.1 x 10.5 cm). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Gift of Jacqueline Picasso in honor of the Museum’s continuous commitment to Pablo Picasso’s art. © 2015 Estate of Pablo Picasso / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.]

[Many thanks to the Museum of Modern Art, New York, for providing me with the images above and other press materials related to the exhibition Picasso Sculpture, which runs through February 7, 2016.]

[Please follow me on Twitter (@BobDPictureThis) and Facebook (Art Blog By Bob) for more art news and views.]